Preparing for Winter: How to Avoid Being Sued – Part 1

Preparing for Winter: How to Avoid Being Sued - Part 1 By Stavros E. Sitinas EdqWith winter just around the corner, landowners and homeowners have to be careful about how they handle potentially hazardous sidewalk conditions.

A property owner will not be held liable for accidents occurring on his or her property as a result of snow and ice until a reasonable period of time has passed since the end of a storm.

How long is a reasonable period of time? That is typically a question for a jury to determine. That being said, some courts will take the initiative to dismiss certain cases that they feel should never even get to a jurycases in which, as a matter of law, the defendant-owner did not have a reasonable period of time within which to rectify the unsafe conditions. For example:

A winter storm slows down for a period of time after dumping a significant amount of snow – but more is expected within an hour.

If a defendant in an unsafe sidewalk case can prove that the lull in snow fall was actually part of the same storm, then the courts will deem the fall to have taken place while the storm was in progress – and further hold that there was no duty to clear the sidewalks during the short lull in snowfall. Therefore, anybody who slips and falls in that time interval cannot hold the landowner responsible.

Sometimes there are conflicts among different courts as to the appropriate length of time required to clear a sidewalk. There have been cases where 2.5 hours was deemed enough time — if the storm was during the day and the property owner was available to shovel. On the other end of the spectrum, there have been cases that even 4 hours was not enough time to clear the sidewalk. For example, if a storm ends at 2:00am, and if a person was injured four hours later at 6:00am, is the homeowner expected to have his sidewalks cleared by 6:00am? In this example, the case was dismissed.

When there is a grey area the court will not, as a matter of law, dismiss the case. Instead, the case will be decided by a jury at trial.

Stay tuned for part two.

Misconceptions About Frivolous Lawsuits And The McDonald’s “Hot Coffee” Case  Stavros E. Sitinas, Esq.
www.sitinaslaw.com
ssitinas@sitinaslaw.com
(212) 539-1800

This entry was posted in General, Landowner/Homeowner, Personal Injury and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s